“I found an edge! I found an edge! It’s right here!”

not
The strongest signal of what is in focus, and what is within foveal vision, is the hard edge. Outside of the eye’s focal point, and outside of foveal vision, all edges are blurred. Within that zone, any edges that have a strong value transition are emphasized and used by the visual system to develop a conceptual model of three-dimensional visual space.
Painters have the ability to control the sharpness of any edge they wish. An edge can be sharp, completely blurred, or somewhere in between. Over the course of it’s length, you can make an edge change from hard to soft and back to hard again. You can also “lose” an edge by having it blend into it’s background, present only by inference. The systematic use of hard, soft, and lost edges is a powerful tool for composition and control of the path the viewer’s eye as it travels throughout the painting. Because the eye is attracted by hard edges, you can enhance the hardness of whatever you want the viewer to look at more. You can make visual pathways of hard edges that define how the eye enters the picture and moves around it. You can suggest shape by making receding edges softer. You can create a sense of mystery and visual engagement by hiding some edges, requiring the viewer to participate in the process of creating the picture by interpolating edges where you haven’t actually painted them.
Prior to the development of the Venetian style of painting in the early 16th century (Bellini, Giorgione, Titian), edges were usually painted hard, except where soft transitions were required to represent soft forms, forms in shadow, forms in the distance, or turning edges. The Venetian school painters (and all of the vast number of artist influenced by them, such as Rembrandt, Rubens, Velázquez, and just about everyone since then) developed ways to use edges as a compositional device. If you paint all edges except those around your focal point as soft, then the eye is naturally drawn to that area. If you paint objects that are closer to the viewer as having harder edges, then those objects appear closer and you effectively define the three-dimensional space of the picture. If you paint a variety of hard, soft, and lost edges, you increase the complexity of the painting and invite the viewer to explore the composition.
Someday, I’ll be able to consistently make all that work in my compositions. In the meantime, it helps to understand the theory, study paintings that use edges effectively (such as those by Ingres, for example), and become more conscious of how I use edges in composition.
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.