Articles by Katarzyna

I was born in Poland. I live and study art in Ireland. I studied literature, philosophy and theology. My main interests concern aspects of making art like: colour, form, line, sound, animation/video, photography.

Wel­come again — David and the read­ers of the ATSH. Today briefly, but I hope to encour­age you to shower this site with, as always, some inter­est­ing comments.

I know, that ‘Art Ther­apy’ sub­ject is quite loaded with dif­fer­ent mean­ings and, prob­a­bly, not free from con­tro­ver­sies too. Yet, from what I can see brows­ing the rel­e­vant pages, this kind of psy­cho­log­i­cal (med­ical) ther­apy has flour­ished in the US, with AATA (Amer­i­can Art Ther­apy Asso­ci­a­tion) look­ing quite fit and professional.

At the same time it remains rel­a­tively exotic in Europe and espe­cially in Ire­land. My col­lege was first in this coun­try to intro­duce Art Ther­apy MA degrees (based on BA Hons. in Fine Art) — they are avail­able from 1998, became quite pop­u­lar, yet it’s still far from ordi­nary to see Art Ther­a­pist work­ing in insti­tu­tions, schools or hospitals.

I haven’t per­son­ally met yet with any sort of this prac­tice and know noth­ing about its fac­tual effec­tive­ness. I’m inter­ested espe­cially in any record, expe­ri­ence related to the ASD (Autism Spec­trum Dis­or­der), since one case of it has been diag­nosed in my fam­ily. Have you met with an art ther­apy “in action”? Are you your­self qual­i­fied and prac­tic­ing? Do you have any opin­ions, thoughts or expe­ri­ences on that sub­ject, on how it works (if at all) on autis­tic chil­dren? Thanks for sharing.

Tags: ,

  • First and fore­most — to keep the work alive with thinking/reflection
  • To pre­serve unique moments of a discovery
  • To pre­serve equally unique moments of a struggle/crisis
  • To learn from one’s own story
  • To exer­cise an insight and self-recognition
  • To learn self-discipline and persistence
  • To develop skill in a creative/accurate writing
By “Stu­dio Jour­nal” I mean any form of a writ­ten record of one’s own progress/actions in an artis­tic stu­dio (by ‘stu­dio’ I mean an actual work­place — wher­ever thinking/working takes place; it can be a gallery, trip, work­shop, library).

It can be kept in a form of a sketch­book, where draw­ings, work-samples, illus­tra­tions are included, how­ever a spe­cial care should be taken for putting expe­ri­ences into words… It’s slightly sim­i­lar to main­tain­ing a web-blog, how­ever, more personal…

It’s best reward­ing when the dis­ci­pline of reg­u­lar notes (based on every­day, each two/three days fre­quency) is applied consistently.

I’ve been sus­tain­ing my own ‘Jour­nal’ for a month as for now and must say — it’s got a power to sur­prise. I mean — read­ing my own two-weeks-old thoughts is some­times like fly­ing on another planet…

But one impor­tant rule — one has to be hon­est — and a diary is a great lec­ture on hon­esty… On one day I wrote: “I’m not going to pre­tend that I have some­thing inter­est­ing to say…” And some­times is noth­ing more than that…

So, good luck with that — if you accept this chal­lenge of mine…

Tags: , , , ,

Quite recently I’ve got an inter­est­ing, half-an-hour talk about noth­ing. It hap­pened to be focused on mod­ern art, mod­ern human con­di­tion, place for beauty and ethics within it and, after mak­ing a heroic round in escap­ing its inbuilt vac­uum it came to the point of an incep­tion — to a rather corny remark that “non­sense” seems to be a sur­name of today’s exis­tence. How to make art in the mod­ern chaos and to remain sane? Although Louis Bour­geois wrote in her paint­ing that Art is the war­ranty of san­ity she wrote also I’ve been in Hell and back, and let me tell you — it was won­der­ful. Going to Hell is the con­di­tion of the mod­ern artist, whether s/he comes back and is ready to admit that it was won­der­ful is a quite another, usu­ally very per­sonal story.

Since my part­ner in the above-mentioned chat was far from being an aver­age, junior, intel­li­gent guy who finds “fash­ion­able” to talk post-modern slo­gans (no mat­ter how out of place they are), we’ve man­aged to make a way for some deeper obser­va­tions. Yet every­thing seemed to slip through our fin­gers — any sense, any under­stand­ing of each other. Why is it so dif­fi­cult to com­mu­ni­cate on a level, where any social game must to dis­ap­pear in the pres­ence of truth? Why in the age of gutsy exhi­bi­tion­ism, omnipresent “dis­play” of human “val­ues” we are mute and/or extremely ama­teur­ish when it comes to for­mu­late, under­stand and con­vey basic reflec­tion on our exis­ten­tial con­di­tion? I won­der what was that ancient Greek spoke about, or peo­ple of 18th cen­tury France, or even con­tem­po­raries of Hem­ing­way, Kafka, Dos­to­jew­ski? Have they been taught the art of com­mu­ni­cat­ing one­self to oth­ers or maybe times they lived in encour­aged it in the most nat­ural fashion?

So we talked about beauty which became some­thing ter­ri­bly old-fashioned, neglected and mis­un­der­stood. After Picasso and the mod­ern rest ridiculed clas­si­cal rules of har­mony and plea­sure it seems to be quite trendy to make art that dis­turbs, wipes out smile and joy; art of dark colours, sad faces and delib­er­ately non­cha­lant in appear­ance. Even if beauty occurs it’s very often acci­den­tal, has noth­ing in com­mon with beliefs and aspi­ra­tions of an artist. Major­ity of work in my col­lege is like that, my own work oscil­lates between “blue” and dark­ness of being alive here and now… What a waste of a pair of healthy hands. Why not to aspire to be the next Cezanne or Canova? Why not to aspire to make the hap­pi­est, the most beau­ti­ful paintings/sculptures ever? Why even these ques­tions sound ridiculously?

It was the eter­nal beauty of art in Paris that grabbed my mind and heart. Who knows — maybe it’s the right time for a new Renais­sanse, for redis­cov­er­ing once again value and sense in our human con­di­tion? That could be even interesting…

Just for the clas­si­cal taste, few shots of The Louvre’s trea­sures I took dur­ing my trip to Paris:

Tags: , , ,


April 192008

Art is the war­ranty of san­ity she wrote also Going to Hell is the con­di­tion of the mod­ern artist, whether s/he comes back and is ready to admit that it was won­der­ful is a quite another, usu­ally very per­sonal story.

Just for the clas­si­cal taste, few shots of trea­sures I took dur­ing my trip to Paris:

Don’t be too over­whelmed by the title. It’s meant to be too big to what I’m going to write here… I just need a sort of its intel­lec­tual chal­lenge to re-start me again for the ATSH, which I was forced to neglect by some tech­ni­cal dif­fi­cul­ties… To every­one who doesn’t know — I’m a con­trib­u­tor to this site and hop­ing to make most of David’s cour­tesy to let me be here and address you, my audience…

So, today few loose reflec­tions on what I con­sider as an expe­ri­ence of being ‘a con­tem­po­rary artist’. First of all, I must say I’m intensely reluc­tant to use the word when refer­ring to myself and my iden­tity. And it isn’t merely due being ‘just’ an art stu­dent, but it seems to be rooted in my deep belief that, what a human being under­goes in a long, com­plex process of mak­ing (cre­at­ing) of what art crit­ics will call ‘an art­work’ can­not be expressed in a one, semi­ot­i­cally dis­torted and cul­tur­ally mis­un­der­stood and abused (just have a quick surf around ‘artis­tic’ pages — any­thing now can be called ‘art’ and any­body ‘an artist’) term. Who am I then? — some­body study­ing, mak­ing, deal­ing with art, some­body strug­gling with artis­tic means to find myself — that belief will (hope­fully) never change. If so called ‘art-world’ (art lovers, crit­ics) will name me even­tu­ally ‘an artist’ one day I will feel rec­og­nized and appre­ci­ated, but it always be a sort of a sim­pli­fi­ca­tion of my activ­i­ties, putting ‘a label’ in order to ‘classify’.

Czes­law Milosz, one of my favourite poets had tried twice his poet­i­cally non-compromising def­i­n­i­tion of what does it mean to be ‘an artist’; and his under­stand­ing, both quite roman­tic and yet clas­si­cal, is worth to be dis­played here. So, first of all, it reminds of being a child in a world made by adults and con­se­quently — to be always vul­ner­a­ble and ready enough to hear their indulging laugh­ter… And sec­ondly — it’s a deci­sion (a sane one yet tran­scend­ing the ‘com­mon sense’ level) of let­ting one­self to be the land of demons that rule here as if they were at home and speak numer­ous lan­guages — it means to be like an always open house, with­out a key in the doors, so your invis­i­ble guests get in and leave with an ease…

An artist (should write ‘a gen­uine one’ but there are no ‘fake artists’, just like an Art — it’s true or isn’t art) then would be less a strong, self-confident indi­vid­ual of the per­son­al­ity sharp as a knife and being dri­ven by an above-average ambi­tion and inge­nious ideas (Picasso’s , Damien Hirst’s type) but more — an extremely sen­si­tive, open, always curi­ous, inno­cent and naïve in a sense (as a delib­er­ately adopted atti­tude) char­ac­ter; so com­plex that appear­ing as sim­ple, so pow­er­ful that let­ting him­self to be a sort of ‘a medium’ for what is tran­scen­dent, super­nat­ural (Mark Tobey’s name comes to my mind). Does one have to be born this way, or — is it pos­si­ble to ‘made’ an artist out of noth­ing pre­ex­ist­ing in him/her innately? How does it all trans­late into func­tion­ing in this very world of “dead” God, ‘thirsty’ deal­ers and agents, traf­fic jams, mort­gages, hyper­mar­kets, rip-off men­tal­ity? Self-deceiving, com­pro­mises, psy­cho­log­i­cal dis­tur­bances?
No, I don’t want you to get an impres­sion that I pose for a mar­tyr or a vic­tim… More I think about me and oth­ers being luck­ily ‘con­demned’ to art more I believe that the game is worth all the invest­ment and much, much more… It’s this sort of a chal­lenge that, liv­ing in the ancient times when gods were still alive and kick­ing, you would say: ‘I’ve been touched by some­thing that is greater than me, and I will never be the same man again. And it’s like a burn­ing fire some­times, but I wouldn’t exchange that for all the wealth of this world’

Sorry if sound­ing sen­ti­men­tal… Greet­ings to all art-aficionados…

Tags: , , ,

Peter How­son (b. Lon­don 1958) is one of these painters who are “writ­ing” their art with their life; or — in other words — they con­tin­u­ously pro­voke chal­lenges and arrange “scenog­ra­phy” in order to give their work a rea­son for exis­tence. In that sense How­son occu­pies the oppo­site side to, for exam­ple, Henry Matisse or Joan Miro who lived com­par­a­tively ordi­nary lives of fam­ily men and their paint­ings seemed to emerge, first of all, from their intense inner life. Peter would be one of these artists, with whom Mar­cel Duchamp was likely to be fas­ci­nated. Artists with an amaz­ing per­sonal story and con­tro­ver­sial work. I found myself being fas­ci­nated by that story both as a human­ist and a per­son study­ing art.

Peter How­son met with vio­lence and humil­i­a­tion at a young age being bul­lied by his class­mates. He was small, quiet and “dif­fer­ent”, he wouldn’t play foot­ball dur­ing brakes sim­ply because he pre­ferred to stay inside and draw. Lately, he names his sick­ness of the soul as the Asperger’s Syn­drome. The psy­cho­log­i­cal effects of that early lone­li­ness and bru­tal­ity were to be long-lasting. At 17 he got into Glas­gow School of Art (Peter’s fam­ily moved to Scot­land when he was four and he’s rec­og­nized as a “Scot­tish” artist) but he found him­self fight­ing with bad, non-understanding teaching.

Dis­il­lu­sioned, he quits school after a year and enrolls in the British Army. It’s quite an unusual move for a sen­si­tive, intro­verted boy with the his­tory of bul­ly­ing. He stands mil­i­tary life for nine months and appre­ci­ates the period as being one of the most for­ma­tive in his entire life. Per­son­ally, I admire that choice made just in the right time and prob­a­bly with the instinct that in order to learn how to swim one has to throw him­self into deep water. Peter How­son had con­fronted his fears and per­haps bad mem­o­ries and he did this strug­gling through the hard, an extreme way. That “extreme” trait will develop to be the painter’s alter ego — How­son as we know him now.

Hav­ing fin­ished the art school (thanks to an encour­ag­ing teacher — Sandy Mof­fat) Peter starts yet another fight, this time last­ing through­out his mature life of an artist and man. It’s a bat­tle of wills between Peter How­son — a vic­tim of his own psy­che and Peter How­son — a man of action and adven­ture, a tal­ented painter with a great insight in the human soul.

In his early 20s the painter faces his fas­ci­na­tion with the gym and heroes in A. Schwarzenegger’s type. Soon he admits that because he took things to a ridicu­lous extreme he had became so muscle-bound that he hated the way he looked. Also, his first paint­ing series would be an acute, although slightly car­i­ca­tured depic­tion of body builders, hard men and hooli­gans. At the same time the artist speaks out how much he actu­ally detests the world he depicts: I hate vio­lence. And I believe that every­one, no mat­ter how gen­tle they think they are, has the capac­ity for it within them…

Through mid-1980s his pro­file rose steadily and within rel­a­tively short period of time How­son found him­self being col­lected by Madonna, David Bowie, Bob Geldof and being rejected by the respectable muse­ums at the same time. Ini­tially thrilled by the fame he soon real­izes a trap he and his admir­ers have set up — a trap of gen­er­at­ing works in a one, rec­og­nized style and in a one pop­u­lar the­matic cir­cle (just think about dozens of other artists who would never try to escape from such a com­fort­able trap). He knew he had to make him­self different.

That’s how he threw him­self into another very deep water — he became an offi­cial painter of the war in the for­mer Yugoslavia, so-called Bosn­ian War (19921995). That was cer­tainly the most extreme chal­lenge of the “extreme painter”. First time he went unpre­pared and came back seri­ously sick, the home press labelled him “a cow­ard”. He had returned and demanded an army uni­form and to be treated like a sol­dier. That expe­ri­ence was about to make him a dif­fer­ent man. The war is one of the most bar­baric in the his­tory — a civil butch­ery based on eth­nic grounds with mass frat­ri­ci­dal killings and rapes, tor­tures and muti­la­tions. How­son called it a war of vio­lence and humil­i­a­tion becom­ing him­self a kind of a poignantly expe­ri­enced expert in both. What exactly the painter wit­nessed remains his mys­tery (he rejected the pres­ence of jour­nal­ists at his sec­ond visit) but he admits that he had never been closer to sui­cide and — para­dox­i­cally — never felt more alive.

A series of Howson’s Bosn­ian huge-scaled can­vases caused a big debate in Great Britain and beyond with the major media — The Times, BBC being involved. And it started even before they had their pre­mière at the Peter How­son: Bosnia exhi­bi­tion in the Impe­r­ial War Museum (Lon­don) in 1994. Some of the paint­ings appeared “too explicit” for a pub­lic view (espe­cially the pow­er­ful Croa­t­ian and Mus­lim depict­ing a bru­tal rape), some were ques­tioned on a basis of their his­tor­i­cal value as the painter admit­ted not to wit­ness him­self some of the scenes (but “just” using his imagination).

The paint­ings belong to the most pow­er­ful images of the con­tem­po­rary fig­u­ra­tive art. They depict women being raped, cas­trated men, hanged ani­mals, ragged refugees and above all — anony­mous faces, for­mi­da­ble, unfor­get­table phys­iog­nomies of those who went through hell. These works have the drama, fan­tasy, emo­tional inten­sity and vision­ary qual­ity of W. Blake’s and H. Bosch’s paint­ings. They were born from sin­cer­ity and an authen­tic spir­i­tual pain, from pas­sion and courage, from a sin­ful fas­ci­na­tion by the evil side of the human nature and a heroic strug­gle against it. It has to be said that the con­tem­po­rary art seems to be noth­ing like that…

Recently, Peter How­son makes head­lines over abus­ing drugs and alco­hol. He turned towards reli­gious themes.

In Phaidon’s 20th Cen­tury Art Book his name appears among 499 the most impor­tant artists of the past century.

Here is Howson’s offi­cial web page:Peter How­son

For fur­ther read­ing I do rec­om­mend books:

- Jack­son, A. A Dif­fer­ent Man, 1997

- Heller, R. Peter How­son, 1993

howson

howson

howsonhowson

P.S.

Dear Read­ers,

With David’s per­mis­sion I would like to invite you on my own page I’ve been devel­op­ing through­out the last week — Terra Incog­nita

We agreed on cross-posting (I will pub­lish some of my texts/images on both blogs and David — feel free to post on my site), but I would like also to con­tribute some pieces designed just for this site.

All The Strange Hours will remain a ter­rain of my debut, so it will always be a lit­tle bit spe­cial for me.

Tags: , ,

Half — term of the first term in the sec­ond year of my study has just approached. I found myself enjoy­ing my time in the col­lege much more than I could ini­tially imag­ine, but this wouldn’t be pos­si­ble with­out great peo­ple I met.

The main good points of study art in an insti­tu­tion (espe­cially when you’re not quite inde­pen­dent finan­cially) is that you’re being sup­plied with a free stu­dio space, free tuitions (these depend on the coun­try and a type of the insti­tu­tion), free work­shops and an easy access to a very use­ful equip­ment (cam­eras, pro­jec­tors, books etc.). There is obvi­ously another issue too com­plex to be con­verted eco­nom­i­cally — you’re sur­rounded by pas­sion­ates, both stu­dents and “mas­ters”, who are there at a length of your arm each time you need a talk, an advise or a feedback.

And there are argu­ments con­tra, which tend to be equally pow­er­ful. Unless you con­sider your­self a psy­cho­log­i­cally strong per­son, com­par­a­tively sure why are you doing, what you’re doing, also– unless you’re able to reflect crit­i­cally on your envi­ron­ment I wouldn’t rec­om­mend study­ing fine art in a struc­tured man­ner.
First of all, you have to func­tion within an edu­ca­tional pro­gram designed for major­ity — 18-years old stu­dents (in a case of a pub­lic col­lege) and to fight its great poten­tial to infan­tilise any­one who doesn’t need to be watched and dis­ci­plined for the most of the time just to develop prop­erly. On the other hand it imposes a sys­tem of divid­ing your time (terms, time spent in stu­dio, at lec­tures etc.) and mark­ing, which can be pretty dis­tract­ing and/or con­fus­ing (because we’re all humans, we want to per­form for 80%, not for 40% — but does 80% make you a bet­ter artist?).
There’re tuto­ri­als and sem­i­nars where you’re expected to more or less make your teach­ers happy by a clear, elo­quent and ambi­tious pre­sen­ta­tion of your progress and answer­ing all the ques­tions, no mat­ter how point­less they may sound. If you’re a young, unex­pe­ri­enced and untrained in a log­i­cal argu­men­ta­tion or if you’re an intro­vert feel­ing extremely uncom­fort­ably in being pub­licly exposed in that par­tic­u­lar way, you’re in a vul­ner­a­ble sit­u­a­tion.
I remem­ber a very quiet girl who’s no longer with us, most prob­a­bly because the sys­tem I study in pro­motes, first of all, out­go­ing and intel­lec­tu­ally able indi­vid­u­als which doesn’t nec­es­sary trans­late into pro­mot­ing those truly tal­ented and aware of what that’s really mean to study art.

So — what that’s actu­ally mean “to study art”? I’m ask­ing myself and all of you there, study­ing art each day in insti­tu­tions, on your own, purely for hobby, just for fun?

I still smile recall­ing my chat with a teacher, a painter:
– What’s the mean­ing you want to con­vey? — he asked look­ing at my set of steel tubes and glass struc­tures.
– I’m not sure if there’s any mean­ing I would like to con­vey.
– But there must be some­thing you want to com­mu­ni­cate.
– Do I have to com­mu­ni­cate any­thing?
– You have to make your view­ers aware of your inten­tions. You have to be respon­si­ble for the mes­sage you con­vey.
– What do you mean “to be respon­si­ble”?
– I mean — he said loos­ing his patience a lit­tle bit — that your art always tells a story. And that you are a teller. Do you know your story well enough?
– But, if I mean my paint­ing to com­mu­ni­cate only itself — a paint­ing for painting…Do I have to gen­er­ate other mean­ings just for the sake of my view­ers?
– An art for art’s sake — there’s no such thing. Art hap­pens between you, your work and those who react to it…Just look — I see your set as a cold, aus­tere and beau­ti­ful place. If I call dozens of peo­ple I’m sure their reac­tion will be iden­ti­cal.
– But how do you know that I con­sciously inscribed that meaning…I just found the pieces and I liked them so I put them together…- I answered quite frankly.
We con­tin­ued in that fash­ion until he resigned and promised to return once I will be ready “to com­mu­ni­cate” something.

I recall that con­ver­sa­tion sim­ply because it made me think a lot about my study and art in gen­eral. Espe­cially, the imper­a­tive of “com­mu­ni­cat­ing some­thing” and “being respon­si­ble” for the meaning(s) my art could gen­er­ate in peo­ple.
I used to work quite intu­itively and even auto­mat­i­cally, just trust­ing my cre­ative poten­tial and not car­ing about the out­come until the very end.
So, does “study­ing art” mean learn­ing com­mu­ni­ca­tional and social skills which would trans­form me into an expert in “meanings”and recep­tion of my work?
Or — is it sim­ply a train­ing in tech­niques and strate­gies for pro­duc­ing “read­able” art-products? You may say — study­ing art can be par­tially both… But what beyond this? Or — are those aspects really that important?

Tags:

Con­sid­ered to func­tion among the most inti­mate, per­sonal of all arts draw­ing is often defined in many dif­fer­ent ways.

Draw­ing appears to be an act of mark mak­ing, a prod­uct of that act, a vehi­cle for visual expres­sion, a skill of see­ing things as they are (copy­ing real­ity), extract­ing an essence from a drawn object, cre­at­ing fic­tion (eg. draw­ing from imag­i­na­tion) and many more.

What dif­fers draw­ing from other means of expres­sion (espe­cially from paint­ing) are mate­ri­als and tech­niques used but also the func­tion and purpose.

When it’s quite pop­u­lar among artists, design­ers, archi­tects to make prepara­tory sketches in a “trial and error” approach lead­ing usu­ally towards a fin­ished piece; its much less recog­nised to pro­duce eg. a paint­ing as a purely intro­duc­tory mate­r­ial made towards a drawn piece (I mean a draw­ing as a fin­ished art­work).
The his­tory of art is par­tially “respon­si­ble” for that. While art col­leges widely recog­nised draw­ing as a “foun­da­tion of art” and a very use­ful excer­cise in eye/hand train­ing, the prod­ucts them­selves remained often unsigned and were never under­stood as equal to paint­ings, sculp­tures or prints.

Today’s posi­tion of draw­ing is even worse. Dis­cov­ery of pho­tog­ra­phy, cin­e­matog­ra­phy, mass-media and more recently multi-media made a paper-pencil based art a sort of an old-fashioned, hob­by­is­tic inter­est use­ful for kids, some artists (“some” because there’s quite a num­ber of pro­fes­sion­als deal­ing with draw­ing only mar­gin­ally) and peo­ple who just don’t have a cam­era or com­puter around the cor­ner (and they’re in a need of recording/processing some­thing visu­ally).
There are art col­leges (my col­lege is one of them) where draw­ing as an inde­pen­dent sub­ject doesn’t exist, no com­pul­sory classes are func­tion­ing and stu­dents who fin­ish their degree are at con­sid­er­ably var­i­ous lev­els in terms of drawing.

One may ask — why to bother at all (as we, in the 21st cen­tury, have sophis­ti­cated elec­tronic tools and processes for image mak­ing, record­ing etc)? Lets take a mod­ern cityscape — Isn’t a photo of it (obvi­ously in colour and enhanced on the Pho­to­shop) or dig­i­tally manip­u­lated design (again fab­u­lously colour­ful and “busy”) a more accu­rate account, than a B&W mod­est sketch?

In our times — we like an option of “an instant life” (think about instant cof­fee — quick, more or less the same each time, requir­ing no skill or knowl­edge to make it, an imi­ta­tion of a “real” cof­fee); we’re stuffed with images which are just per­fect (think about the National Geo­graphic breath­tak­ing pho­tos); we have no under­stand­ing and/or expe­ri­ence of a slow, some­times labo­ri­ous and non-efficient crafts­man­ship (like eg. goldsmith’s or shoemaker’s crafts­man­ship).
That all com­bines towards a model-modern-man (an aver­age man) who doesn’t even con­sider him­self draw­ing (writ­ing) not because he thinks he’s got no tal­ent (that’s more “advanced” think­ing) or that draw­ing is “for artists” (writ­ing for writ­ers). He doesn’t even con­sider him­self draw­ing (writ­ing) because he’s got no need for trans­lat­ing real­ity that sur­rounds him into a mean­ing­ful and insight­ful set of lines on a sheet of paper (an insight­ful set of sentences).

We draw what we want to famil­iarise and to under­stand (that’s the main pur­pose of chil­dren’ draw­ings). Reject­ing draw­ing doesn’t mean that we under­stood every­thing, but more that we chose another mode of func­tion­ing in our world — that of sim­pli­fied, defen­sive, focused on sym­bols, stereo­types and mass-images rather than on real sub­jects with their real nature.
This is a point when draw­ing starts to shift towards its deep­est mean­ing. Draw­ing as a visual voice of a par­tic­u­lar phi­los­o­phy of an individual’s life.
Phi­los­o­phy of being con­stantly con­scious, insight­ful, skill­ful enough and ready for mul­ti­ple inter­pre­ta­tions and trans­la­tions of objects, set­tings, sit­u­a­tions and phe­nom­ena.
This kind of draw­ing is a life-long chal­lenge, under­stood more in terms of extract­ing (or look­ing for, research­ing) senses rather than sim­ply as a tech­nique or a product.

Tags:

Welcome

My name is Katarzyna Skonieczna (pron: cath­rina sconetchna). I was born in Poland, I live at a lit­tle island of Cobh, South-West Ire­land and study Fine Art at the Craw­ford Col­lege of Art in Cork. I stud­ied lit­er­a­ture, phi­los­o­phy and the­ol­ogy back in Poland. I always wanted to study psy­chol­ogy but just didn’t have the right oppor­tu­nity. I used to express myself ver­bally by writ­ing short sto­ries (and end­lessly writ­ing a book, which remains unfin­ished as for now) and also — visu­ally by draw­ings but it was only a side inter­est. Then, after I made myself com­fort­able in Ire­land I got a strong need to deepen my adven­ture with art; so I applied to the near­est col­lege. My main inter­ests con­cern — above all — human con­di­tion in its purest phe­nom­ena — iden­tity, emo­tions, des­tiny (all art is about that — said my tutor and he’s right); then apects like colour, form, line. I’m pas­sion­ate about draw­ing, oils, pho­tog­ra­phy, print­mak­ing, instal­la­tion and animation/video art. I feel being inspired by Sur­re­al­ism, Cubism, Ger­man Expres­sion­ism and Fanatsy/Illustartion art (eg. Patric Woodroffe). I pro­posed David (whom I really grate­ful to for this pos­si­bil­ity) my con­tri­bu­tion — “Study­ing Art” where I am hop­ing to reflect on some basic aspects of studying/discovering art (which puz­zle and /or worry me) such as “What’s art and what is it for?” “Can art be taught/learnt — if yes which way?”, “Art in the past and today”, “What’s bad/good art?” etc. I would like also to keep a sort of a diary from my stud­ies — notes, study work, work­shops etc. Before I start I have to make you aware of two things — Eng­lish is not my mother-tounge, so I apol­o­gise in advance for any mis­spelling (no mat­ter how stu­pid it will look/sound) and for “rusty” usage of words/phrases; and another thing — I may not to be able to con­tribute on a regural basis — but I will do any­thing to keep my pos­i­tive influ­ence on this site.
P.S.
I kindly invite a lively response to my posts, because I don’t believe in writ­ing only to myself and to the Muse. Impor­tant part of why I’m doing this is a pre­cious oppor­tu­nity to exchange opin­ions and thoughts. Thanks

Tags:

Drawing

<ins datetime=”200710-2