<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All the Strange Hours &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/tag/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Making and Thinking About Visual Art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eiffel flashing</title>
		<link>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/08/09/eiffel-flashing/</link>
		<comments>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/08/09/eiffel-flashing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David's photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the Eiffel Tower, seen at night from the first of three stages in the journey to the top. Every fifteen minutes (I think) there is a small light show across tower, and I managed to catch this shot with the lights going. This photo had a lot of digital noise. To correct this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a id="p159" rel="attachment" class="imagelink" title="Eiffel Flashing" href="http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/08/09/eiffel-flashing/eiffel-flashing/"><img align="right" title="Eiffel Flashing" id="image159" alt="Eiffel Flashing" src="http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/eiffel-flashing.thumbnail.jpg" /></a>This is the Eiffel Tower, seen at night from the first of three stages in the journey to the top. Every fifteen minutes (I think) there is a small light show across tower, and I managed to catch this shot with the lights going.</p>

<p>This photo had a lot of digital noise. To correct this in Photoshop, I copied the image to a new layer, set the blending mode to Color, and applied a gaussian blur. This removed the noise without removing detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/08/09/eiffel-flashing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Online Photographer</title>
		<link>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/29/the-online-photographer/</link>
		<comments>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/29/the-online-photographer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is a lovely photography blog by Mke Johnston. He has great taste in photography, unencumbered by rules that say what a good photo or a good composition is supposed to be. He’s incredibly knowledgeable about photography without being a pedantic techie. And he has strong, cranky opinions that are always worth reading and considering. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is a lovely photography blog by Mke Johnston. He has great taste in photography, unencumbered by rules that say what a good photo or a good composition is supposed to be. He’s incredibly knowledgeable about photography without being a pedantic techie. And he has strong, cranky opinions that are always worth reading and considering.</p>

<p><a href="http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/">The Online Photographer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/29/the-online-photographer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This photo</title>
		<link>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/21/this-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/21/this-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David's photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is from County Connemara, Ireland. Without editing, the photo is kind of boring (trust me). But I was playing with the Curves adjustment in Photoshop, and something happened with the foliage: parts of the forest emerged as bright and saturated, while the rest fell dramatically into darkness. It was a very striking effect. It took [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Mist" class="imagelink" rel="attachment" id="p177" href="http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/21/this-photo/mist/"><img align="right" alt="Mist" id="image177" title="Mist" src="http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/mist.thumbnail.jpg" /></a>is from County Connemara, Ireland. Without editing, the photo is kind of boring (trust me). But I was playing with the Curves adjustment in Photoshop, and something happened with the foliage: parts of the forest emerged as bright and saturated, while the rest fell dramatically into darkness. It was a very striking effect. It took took some tweaking to make that effect work without distorting the rest of the picture, but I think the result is interesting.</p>

<p>By the way, while I accomplished this manipulation digitally, it’s not anything that couldn’t be done with film in the development process. So don’t get all purist on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/21/this-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photoshop greyscale conversion</title>
		<link>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/10/photoshop-greyscale-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/10/photoshop-greyscale-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love black and white photography. Here are some ways to convert color digital images to black and white (or variations on the theme of low saturation tone) in Photoshop. There are special programs and plug-ins for doing this, but I find that Photoshop has all the flexibility I need. The simplest, and least satisfying, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love black and white photography. Here are some ways to convert color digital images to black and white (or variations on the theme of low saturation tone) in Photoshop. There are special programs and plug-ins for doing this, but I find that Photoshop has all the flexibility I need.</p>

<p>The simplest, and least satisfying, method of converting a color photo to greyscale in Photoshop is to choose Image -&gt; Mode -&gt; Grayscale. It just strips the color information out of the file, converting each pixel to a shade of grey. You have not control over the process. This is not the right tool. Never use this.</p>

<p>A better way is to create a Channel Mixer adjustment layer in the layers palette. In the dialog box, you can choose the percentage of each channel that contributes to the final image (it’s good to have the numbers add to approximately 100). Play around with different values until you get an image you like. This is a good way to do it, especially since the adjustment layer doesn’t change the original image. You can change the channel mixer values, or go back to color, any time you want. You can also adjust the opacity of the channel mixer layer to desaturate the image to whatever degree you like.</p>

<p>Even more flexible (but more complex) is this method: first, create a Hue/Saturation adjustment layer (rename it to “desat”). Change its blending mode to Saturation. In the dialog box, move the Saturation slider to 0. Now the image is greyscale; big deal. But now create another Hue/Saturation adjustment layer underneath the first (rename it “tone”). Play with the Hue slider. As you do, you see a dynamically changing view of the image as colors used to create the grayscale image change. You can select for yourself the value that best brings out shadow detail or whatever you like. If you like a toned effect (like sepia, only with whatever tones you want), create a Color Balance adjustment layer on top of the two other layers. Try changing the color values differently for shadows, midtones, and highlights. For example, you can have a “grayscale” image with cool darks blending into warm highlights.</p>

<p>Very nifty.</p>

<p><hr /></p>

<p><em>Update 25 February 2007:</em> As Scott Williams pointed out in a comment, this technique is made obsolete by the more flexible Black and White adjustment layer in Photoshop <span class="caps">CS3.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rourkevisualart.com/wordpress/2006/07/10/photoshop-greyscale-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

